Towards an Operational Model of Human Emotion

30 Oct

As neuroscience becomes increasingly prominent in mental health practice, practitioners look for approaches and tools that can facilitate clinical progress, based upon new insights.  Progress in brain research has provided a wealth of research data that provides an understanding of brain mechanisms and processes.  Some of this knowledge relates to cognitive processing, and provides a basis for understanding a wide range of cognitive issues related to attention, reasoning, and decision-making.  However, a key element in clinical mental health is that of emotion, and the valence, or quality, that clients assign to their experiences.  Often, emotion can outweigh reason or knowledge, in determining how and when decisions will be made, and how clients interact with their internal as well as external worlds.

At a certain level, all decisions are emotional.  As much as we may pride ourselves on making objective decisions based upon rational input, there is no denying the sense of satisfaction and security that accompanies a decision that is made in the face of a complete and thorough assessment.  Similarly, it is hard to imagine one feeling confortable in securing a plan that is accompanied by any strong sense of trepidation or fear.  In all, any path that we pursue is accompanied by a sense of our individual judgment of whether it is safe to proceed, or whether there are possible considerations that have not been fully evaluated.

Counselors and other mental health professionals are in need of an operational model that can guide assessment, as well as treatment and evaluation of client responses.

As Allen Ivey (2012) stated, mental health counseling is neuroscience.  Counselors have the tools to alter brain physiology and function by virtue of interventions that change clients.  They are able to influence the reward patterns and reasoning processes, as well as the emotional responses, that define client needs and capabilities.

We currently work under a medical paradigm that assumes that if we are able to identify a client deficiency or excess of some key agent, then we can intervene by changing that parameter using pharmaceuticals, electricity, or other physical means.  However, this begs the issue of the underlying internal factors, as well as the external factors, that have lead to the presenting problem.  We may face a situation akin to pouring water into a leaking bucket, or bailing water out of a bucket in the rain, both of which are temporary solutions, at best.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: